After Mark and me, the only movie reviewer I think isn't chock full of shit is Roger Ebert. Sure, there are times when I disagree with his positions, but I think he's usually right about things. And most importantly, when I don't think he's right, I can at least see his reasoning. But I have to take issue with something I've just read.
See, I'm re-reading I Hated, Hated, Hated This Movie, Ebert's pretty excellent collection of reviews of shitty films. In it, he has this to say about a movie called The Doom Generation. He gives the movie zero stars, which is just fine by me because it is indeed terrible, but just read this and bear with me.
"[Director Gregg Araki] wants to make a blood-soaked, disgusting, disturbing movie about characters of low intelligence and little personal worth, but he's not willing to cop to that, and so by giving them smarmy pop-culture references and nihilistic dialogue, and filling the edges of the frame with satirical in-jokes and celebrity walk-ons...he's keeping himself at arm's length. Hey, if we're dumb enough to be offended by his sleazefest, that's our problem; Araki is, you see, a stylist, who can use concepts like ...